Atkins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law where, pursuant to the mailbox rule, the petitioner timely filed his rule 3.800(c) motion within sixty days of this Court’s issuance of a mandate on his direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bacchus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-31· cited 7×
• Ward v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-12· cited 7×
• KWAPIL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-29· cited 6×
• Hood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-31· cited 3×
• Muller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-03· cited 1×
• Coker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-27· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-22· cited 39×
• Jolly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-31· cited 7×
• Hood v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-31· cited 3×