Atkins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Bundy’s rationale to hold that a negligent sale of habit-forming pills by a pharmacist was an “accident” within the meaning of general liability policy
• relying on Bundy's rationale to hold that a negligent sale of habit-forming pills by a pharmacist was an \accident\ within the meaning of general liability policy
• failure to warn of dangers involved in using a product “renders the product defective.”
• the trial court did not err in granting the plaintiff’s oral motion for summary judgment; written notice is not required when both parties are present at the trial or hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).