Atienza v. Taub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sexual relationship between patient and physician who was treating her for an industrial injury did not constitute malpractice
• sexual relationship between patient and physician who was treating her for an industrial injury did not constitute malpractice
• malpractice claims against physician who treated plaintiff for phlebitis and then engaged in affair with plaintiff did not state cause of action
• “In examining out-of-state authorities, we find that allegations of a physician’s sexual misconduct have provided a basis for a malpractice action only where the patient has alleged that the physician induced sexual relations as part of the therapy.”
• “In examining out-of-state authorities, we find that allegations of a physician’s sexual misconduct have provided a basis for a malpractice action only where the patient has alleged that the physician induced sexual relations as part of the therapy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).