Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/12/1983
Athas v. Hill
Citations
- 458 A.2d 859
- 54 Md. App. 293
- 1983 Md. App. LEXIS 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he privilege given an employee whose injury results from the deliberate intention of his employer to have a cause of action against the employer … is lost if the employee proceeds by way of [workers’] compensation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morton and Garrity
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-06-25· cited 152×
- Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 92×
- Athas v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-06-22· cited 41×
- Simmons First National Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-03-25· cited 36×
- Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-01-09· cited 27×
- Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-09· cited 25×
- Bastian v. LaffinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-05-18· cited 24×
- Procise v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-06-28· cited 23×
- Greco v. FaragoSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-06-20· cited 13×
- Haynie v. National Gypsum Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-10· cited 10×
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. LeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-08· cited 9×
- Anderson v. BimblichCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-05-16· cited 8×
- Wagner v. Allied Chemical Corp.D. Maryland· 1985-12-17· cited 6×
- Sterry v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-09· cited 3×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1973-09-24· cited 2,946×
- Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-01-04· cited 186×
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court· 1961-05-16· cited 121×
- State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-01-19· cited 81×
- Continental Casualty Co. v. MirabileCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-07· cited 74×
- Evans v. MorsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-19· cited 73×
- Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-29· cited 57×
- Hutzell v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-01-23· cited 56×
- Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-07-29· cited 55×
- Kruse v. SchieveWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-12-21· cited 54×
- Leonard v. Sav-A-Stop Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-09· cited 45×
- Neal v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1969-03-17· cited 41×
- Wood v. AbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-13· cited 40×
- Bauman v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-10-21· cited 39×
- Wilson v. HasvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1972-02-07· cited 38×
- Madison v. PierceMontana Supreme Court· 1970-12-17· cited 36×
- Brown v. EstessMississippi Supreme Court· 1979-08-22· cited 33×
- Norfolk & Western Railroad v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1894-06-19· cited 30×
- Dawley v. ThisiusSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-07-03· cited 29×
- Witherspoon v. SalmIndiana Supreme Court· 1969-01-28· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.