Athanasios Theodoropoulos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding alien’s waiver of right to appeal to BIA was a failure to exhaust administrative remedies for jurisdictional purposes
• noting that Theo-doropoulos, when asked by the IJ if he wanted to appeal the IJ’s ruling, said that he wanted “to be removed as soon as possible to [his] country”
• distinguishing its holding from St. Cyr on the grounds that the latter presented “a substantial constitutional question”
• stating, in the context of a habeas petitioner’s failure to appeal an IJ’s decision to the BIA, that this “failure to exhaust ... administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction to entertain his habeas petition”
• stating, in the context of a habeas petitioner's failure to appeal an IJ's decision to the BIA, that this \failure to exhaust ... administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction to entertain his habeas petition\
• stating, in the context of a habeas petitioner’s failure to appeal an IJ’s decision to the BIA, that this “failure to exhaust ... administrative remedies deprived the district court of subject matter jurisdiction to entertain his habeas petition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).