Athanasios Sembos v. Philips Components

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment in age‐discrimination case where applicant was rejected because among other reasons, he was overqualified for position
• promises of employment were “too indefinite, as a matter of law, to constitute unambiguous promises”
• “alleged promises [of employment] were too indefinite, as a matter of law, to constitute unambiguous promises” where promises did not include specific “terms of employment”
• promise of employment without specification of a position, salary, or other terms of employment was too indefinite to constitute an unambiguous promise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).