Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in reliance upon U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., that “the separation clause contained in the St. Paul policy provide[d] separate coverage” for each insured “as if each was separately insured with a distinct policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).