Skip to main content
· 9/30/1994

Atakpa v. Perimeter Ob-Gyn Associates, P.C.

Citations

  • 912 F. Supp. 1566
  • 5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 909
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20801
  • 1994 WL 874202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that prohibiting the proposed amendments would impede the trier of fact from reaching the truth
  • finding that the plaintiff lacked standing to seek an injunction under the ADA because she did not allege that she “will ever seek services from the defendants in the future”
  • “Plaintiffs nonpregnant state is not the reason she lacks standing because she is still in childbearing years and could presumably become pregnant again.”
  • setting forth elements of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.