A.T. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding prior identification admissible even though declarant testified at trial that he possessed neither past nor present ability to identify defendant
• finding prior identification admissible even though de-clarant testified at trial that he possessed neither past nor present ability to identify defendant
• finding prior identification admissible even though declarant testified at trial that he possessed neither past nor present ability to identify defendant
• finding prior identification admissible even though declarant testified at trial that he possessed neither past nor present ability to identify defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Polite v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-16· cited 11×
• A.E.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-16· cited 6×
• Alexander v. Bird Road Ranch & Stables, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-19· cited 1×
• AEB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-14· cited 17×
• Webb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-19· cited 14×
• B. L. W. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-03· cited 9×
• Danek v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-26· cited 3×