At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A one-word, rubber-stamped denial does not ... satisfy the Act’s requirements.... The written decision must reflect the reasoning of the deciding body and the evidence upon which it relied.”
• “This requirement enables a reviewing court to ensure that the decision is not arbitrary, is based upon applicable objective standards and policies of the governing body, and that the requirements of the [Act] and state law are satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).