At & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that written minutes of a meeting and the word “denied” stamped on a letter describing the application were sufficient
• holding that written minutes of a meeting and the word \denied\ stamped on a letter describing the application were sufficient
• holding that the \prohibits\ clause applies to general blanket bans on services and not to individual zoning decisions
• concluding that “policies that do not explicitly ban new service but do, when applied on a case-by-case basis, guarantee the rejection of every application” would be in violation of the prohibition clause of the TCA
• finding that local regulatory agency may discriminate between providers so long as such discrimination is reasonable
• finding that the Act contemplates some discrimination among providers but prohibits only unreasonable discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).