At & T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I v. TiVo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting 10 stay where parties had not exchanged expert reports and court had not held claim construction 11 hearing
• “[I]f the reexamination 16 proceeding should narrow any of the asserted claims of the [patents-in-suit], the scope of 17 [this] litigation may be significantly simplified.”
• “[D]elay inherent in the reexamination process does not constitute undue prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).