At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. General Services Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that Exemption 4 is coextensive with Sections 15.1001 and 15.1003 of the FAR
• new material may be considered if it is explanatory of the original record and contains no new rationalizations
• \we have repeatedly applied [the rule against supplementing the agency record] to bar introduction of litigation affidavits to supplement the administrative rec- ord\
• “[T[he record may be supplemented to provide, for example, background information . . . .”
• “[T]his exception [to remand] may not be employed to offer post-hoc rationalizations .... ”
• order granting government’s motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).