At & T CORP. v. Lanzo Const. Co., Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Florida law explicitly provides that loss of use damages are measured by the amount necessary to rent a similar article or other suitable article within which to perform the services usually performed by the damaged article during the period of repair.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. Mastec, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-10· cited 29×
• Gonzalez v. Barrenechea, Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-29· cited 9×
• MCI, LLC v. Patriot Engineering & Environmental, Inc.
  S.D. Indiana· 2007-05-17· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Ernest Leon Clemons v. Dougherty County, Georgia
  Eleventh Circuit· 1982-09-07· cited 331×
• Meakin v. Dreier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-04-17· cited 31×
• Schryburt v. Olesen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-07· cited 13×
• American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
  D. Connecticut· 1979-04-16· cited 9×
• Maserati Automobiles Inc. v. Caplan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-29· cited 9×
• Finkel v. Challenger Marine Corp.
  S.D. Florida· 1970-08-10· cited 6×