Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp. v. Apotex Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Third Circuit law and holding that district court did not err in considering ANDA
• “The district courts have original 5 jurisdiction over any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents.”
• “[Section] 271(e)(2) provided a new cause of action so that courts could promptly resolve infringement and validity disputes before the ANDA applicant had engaged in the traditional statutorily defined acts of infringement.”
• discussing “market realities” of substitution that do not implicate infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).