AstraZeneca LP v. TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• motion to strike jury granted after Court barred damage expert testimony and party did not otherwise have damage case
• motion to strike jury granted after Court barred damage expert testimony and party did not otherwise have damage case
• “[T]he Lanham Act is silent on whether a cause of action for false advertising . . . requires trial by a jury.” (citations omitted)
• “[F]alse advertising under the Lanham Act is a statutory tort, most similar to common law causes of action for false advertising and trademark infringement.’” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)
• television survey not applied to print ad, website materials, or pamphlets
• television survey not applied to print ad, website materials, or pamphlets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).