Astoria Entertainment, Inc. v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Noerr-Pennington precluded antitrust claims alleging “bribery, extortion and corruption”
• “The key to this exception is that plaintiff itself, not some other third party, was injured by the continuing conspiratorial conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).