Astorga v. Wing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the \principle of exhaustion\ announced in LaPlante \does not apply\ to a case filed in state court
• finding that the exhaustion rule did not apply to state courts because federal courts have the ability to review these determinations, whereas state courts do not
• finding that the exhaustion rule did not apply to state courts because federal courts have the ability to review these determinations, whereas state courts do not
• stating that, unlike federal courts, state courts do not have authority to review a tribal court’s exercise of jurisdiction over nonmembers
• stating that, unlike federal courts, state courts do not have authority to review a tribal court’s exercise of jurisdiction over nonmembers
• doctrine applies 6 BANK OF NEW YORK v. IVAYLO DODEV Opinion of the Court only when tribunal’s authority derives from the same sovereign

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).