Skip to main content
· 4/9/1998

Astill v. Clark

Citations

  • 956 P.2d 1081
  • 340 Utah Adv. Rep. 44
  • 1998 Utah App. LEXIS 25
  • 1998 WL 175083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “fundamental fairness” requires that a party be given an opportunity to put forth evidence to rebut inferences that can be drawn from the other party’s evidence
  • discussing and referring to a rule 35 examination as an “independent medical examination” or an “IME”
  • explaining the difference between percipient and expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Associate P.J., and Jackson and Orme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.