Astete-Diaz v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Commission did “not allege that Defendants acquired and held their dominant position in a deceitful or misleading manner” or “sold their position in the cash window in a fraudulent manner”
• finding “that the alleged scheme is based on the abuse of market power, rather than fraud”
• noting that plaintiff must allege that defendant \acted (or failed to act) with the purpose or conscious object of causing or [a]ffecting a price or price trend in the market that did not reflect the legitimate forces of supply and demand\ (internal quotation marks omitted
• \The Commission may [ ] bring claims alleging violations of the CEA.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).