Asten-Hill Co. v. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the board “unreasonably” “misread” and “substantially misstated” an expert’s statements, and further identifying “[t]he only reasonable reading” of that expert’s opinion
• reversing and remanding for reconsideration where the board “misread [an expert’s] testimony unreasonably”
• “Because of [the board’s] misstatement [of expert testimony], we cannot say whether there is substantial evidence to support the [b] oard’s conclusion on compensability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).