Assurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Jay-Mar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying insurer’s motion for summary judgment where “[t]he discrepancy between [] expert reports” as to whether a loss was caused by a covered or excluded peril “creates a genuine issue of material fact which must be decided by the factfinder in this case”
• insurance policy language excluding from coverage losses caused by excluded peril acting concurrently or sequentially with included peril did not violate public policy
• finding anti-concurrent clause enforceable under New Jersey law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).