Skip to main content
· 6/5/2012

Association of Private Sector Colleges & Universities v. Duncan

Citations

  • 401 U.S. App. D.C. 96
  • 681 F.3d 427
  • 2012 WL 1992003
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “directly or indirectly” is “extremely broad language” (quoting Roma v. United States, 344 F.3d 352, 360 (3d Cir. 2003))
  • “Congress created the Title IV programs to enable more students to attend and graduate from postsecondary institutions.”
  • review is “limited to assessing the record that was actually before the agency”
  • “[I]t would be a stretch, to say the least, to hold that the Department’s use of the word ‘clear’ demonstrates that the agency meant to suggest that its regulatory interpretation was ‘compelled by Congress.’ ”
  • “[Sjchools receive the benefit of accepting tuition payments from students receiving federal financial aid, regardless of whether those students are ultimately able to repay their loans. Therefore, Congress codified statutory requirements in the HEA to ensure against abuse by schools”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Edwards, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.