Association of Flight Attendan v. Michael Huerta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court was without jurisdiction to review an internal guidance document that “inform[s] the exercise of discretion by agents and officers in the field”
• holding that the court was without jurisdiction to review an internal guidance document that “inform[s] the exercise of discretion by agents and officers in the field”
• stating that a document “riddled with caveats is not” likely to constitute a substantive rule
• explaining that a rule’s “most important” distinguishing feature is its “actual legal effect (or lack thereof)”
• stating that a document “riddled with caveats is not” likely to constitute a substantive rule
• explaining that agency action which “imposes new obligations on regulated parties or narrowly limits administrative discretion . . . constitutes a legislative rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).