Association of American Medical Colleges v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo “plainly authorized review” of the challenged action, the mandamus statute could not provide a basis for federal-court jurisdiction
• Medicare Act supplies standing and substantive basis for providers’ challenge to regulations limiting reimbursable costs
• \Jurisdiction is bestowed on the federal courts to review a 'final decision' of the Board ....\
• “Jurisdiction is bestowed on the federal courts to review a ‘final decision’ of the Board . . . .”
• mandamus “is to be employed only under exceptional circumstances, for courts will intervene to disturb the determinations of administrative officers only in clear cases of illegality”
• “The nature of the claim may influence the type of proceeding needed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).