Associates in Adolescent Psychiatry, S.C. v. Home Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a RICO action, that there was no scheme to defraud when the plaintiffs could have verified the veracity of the allegedly fraudulent statements in newspapers
• finding no fraud where “the truth was under [victim’s] nose in black and white (many times over).”
• insurer did not act as a fiduciary by supplying annuity contracts to fund a plan and giving actuarial advice
• financial consultants and designers of ERISA benefit plan are not fiduciaries unless they have control over plan
• “Documents that unambiguously cover a point control over remembered (or misremembered, or invented) oral statements.”
• providers of pro- fessional services who are advising plans are generally not ERISA fiduciaries unless their services give them decision-making authority over the plan or plan assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).