Associated Industries of Mo. v. Lohman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although a prior case applied a more lenient equal protection analysis to a Commerce Clause challenge, it had been “bypassed by later decisions”
• holding that, although a prior case applied a more lenient equal protection analysis to a Commerce Clause challenge, it had been \bypassed by later decisions\
• holding that a state may not, however, “grant its political subdivisions a power to discriminate against interstate commerce that the state lacked in the first instance”
• noting that the Justices “have never deemed a hypothetical possibility of favoritism to constitute discrimination that transgresses constitutional commands”
• noting that the Supreme Court has “never deemed a hypothetical possibility of favoritism to constitute discrimination that transgresses constitutional commands”
• noting that “actual discrimination, wherever it is found, is impermissible, and the magnitude and scope of the discrimination have no bearing on the determinative question whether discrimination has occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).