· 3/28/1975
Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Citations
- 514 F.2d 433
- 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3542
- 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting work- preservation defense raised against section 8(b)(4)(B) charges after determining that the union’s objective was work acquisition
- actions against one employer, but tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives regarding another are outlawed by the statute
- actions against one employer, but tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives regarding another are outlawed by the statute
- \when Congress used 'coerce' in Section 8(b)(4)(B) it . . . intended to reach any form of economic pressure of a compelling or restraining nature\
- “when Congress used ‘coerce’ in Section 8(b)(4)(B) it intended to reach any form of economic pressure of a compelling or restraining nature”
- “Congress enacted Section 8(b)(4)(B) and Section 8(e) to shield unoffending employers from union pressures designed to involve them in disputes not their own. The other subsections of Section 8(b)(4
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koelsch, Kilkenny, Solomon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.