Skip to main content
· 3/28/1975

Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Citations

  • 514 F.2d 433
  • 88 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3542
  • 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 15430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting work- preservation defense raised against section 8(b)(4)(B) charges after determining that the union’s objective was work acquisition
  • actions against one employer, but tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives regarding another are outlawed by the statute
  • actions against one employer, but tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives regarding another are outlawed by the statute
  • \when Congress used 'coerce' in Section 8(b)(4)(B) it . . . intended to reach any form of economic pressure of a compelling or restraining nature\
  • “when Congress used ‘coerce’ in Section 8(b)(4)(B) it intended to reach any form of economic pressure of a compelling or restraining nature”
  • “Congress enacted Section 8(b)(4)(B) and Section 8(e) to shield unoffending employers from union pressures designed to involve them in disputes not their own. The other subsections of Section 8(b)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koelsch, Kilkenny, Solomon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.