Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. Sierra Nevada Chapter v. MacDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Magistrate Judges are afforded broad discretion in resolving nondispositive disputes, including discovery disputes
• stating that “EM conclusively held that a court should not conflate” post-judgment discovery and attachment and that “Respondent must comply with discovery regarding its assets, regardless of whether those assets are ultimately attachable”
• noting that “[a]lthough the immunity of funds in ‘mixed use’ accounts (where some funds are directed towards diplomatic purposes and others used for commercial transactions) is unclear, several decisions have found such funds to be attachable”
• dismissing as untimely objections filed one day after Rule 72(a)’s 14-day deadline and declining to consider them further
• declining to consider 21 objections filed only one day after Rule 72(a)’s deadline as untimely
• refusing to consider objections filed more than fourteen days after the magistrate’s report issued in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).