Skip to main content
· 10/12/2023

Assoc of Club Exct v. City of Dallas

Citations

  • 83 F.4th 958

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion regardless of the underlying basis of the alien’s request to reopen
  • holding that the denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • holding that the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • holding that “the abuse-of-discretion standard applies to motions to reopen ‘regardless of the underlying basis of the alien’s request [for relief].’ ”
  • holding that the abuse-of-discretion standard applies to motions to reopen regardless of the underlying basis of the alien’s request
  • holding that a motion to reopen may be denied for failure to introduce previously unavailable evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.