Ass'n of Private Sector Colleges & Universities v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that judicial immunity applied to “the [d]efendants who served on the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board and the D.C. Committee on Admissions”
• finding that judicial immunity applied to “the [d]efendants who served on the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board and the D.C. Committee on Admissions”
• finding that new legal theories raised in second proceeding were so related to previously litigated questions that they did not constitute distinct issues
• holding plaintiffs had opportunity to be heard regarding injunction when they submitted opposition brief
• holding plaintiffs had opportunity to be heard regarding injunction when they submitted opposition brief
• declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims because the case “ha[d] not progressed past the Motion to Dismiss stage, nor ha[d] the Court invested substantial time and resources in the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).