Assamad v. Square

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[n]o useful public purpose would be served by expanding and interpreting the term ‘record’ as used in our erasure statutes to include the personal knowledge and memory of actual events by police officers” in parole board hearing context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).