Skip to main content
· 2/4/1970

Aspuria v. Mello

Citations

  • 255 Or. 128
  • 464 P.2d 680
  • 1970 Ore. LEXIS 382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming fee award based on total potential cash contribution by defendant even though the full amount was “not paid into the fund”
  • “We have approved the percentage-of-recovery methodology to evaluate attorneys’ fees in a common-fund settlement . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tongue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.