Aspen Technology, Inc. v. Shasha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]estimony alone does not provide specific evidence as to Shasha’s likely costs to arbitrate under the [arbitration] agreement.”
• arbitration provision required that arbitration be conducted “in accordance with the [Commercial Rules].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).