Skip to main content
· 6/21/1995

Aspen Limousine Service, Inc. v. Colorado Mountain Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 891 F. Supp. 1450
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8759
  • 1995 WL 375592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a class is not properly defined when a court “must come to numerous conclusions regarding class membership or must adjudicate the underlying issues on behalf of each class member.”
  • redefining class of female prison employees to exclude future hires and non-union members
  • “The Plaintiffs have met the commonality requirement by alleging that the Defendant has engaged in a general pattern or practice of discrimination against women that violates Title VII by its various employment actions and decisions that have disproportionately harmed female employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.