Asousa Partnership v. Pinnacle Foods, Inc. (In Re Asousa Partnership)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the remedy under § 542(b) “cannot be used to determine the rights of parties in legitimate contract disputes”
• “where grounds for mandatory . . . abstention are present under § 1334, then remand is proper under § 1452(b)”
• The remedy under § 542(b) “cannot be used to determine the rights of parties in legitimate contract disputes.”
• “[Turnover under § 542] cannot be used to determine the rights of parties in legitimate contract disputes.”
• lack of independent jurisdiction weighs in favor of abstention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).