Ask v. Armstrong
Citations
- 9 S.D. 265
- 68 N.W. 743
- 1896 S.D. LEXIS 154
Syllabus
<p>1. Where the original affidavit for an attachment is sufficient, permitting an amendment, if erroneous is without prejudice.</p> <p>2. Neither Comp. Laws, Sec. 4995, Subd. 3, authorizing an attachment in an action to recover a debt incurred for property obtained under false pretenses, nor Sec. 5014, Subd. 2, which gives the rig'ht of attachment on such a debt before maturity, are repealed by Laws 1895, Chap. 67, amendatory of Oomp. Laws, Sec. 4993, enumerating other grounds of attachment. Finch v. Armstrong (S. D.) 68 N. W. 740, followed.</p>
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.