Asiryan v. Med. Staff of Glendale Adventist Med. Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error to dismiss after a “threshold inquiry” that equitable tolling did not apply as a matter of law because the prior administrative and state court proceedings “were not ‘substantially similar’ to this action”
• noting that dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is disfavored where matters outside the complaint are not considered and where equitable tolling may apply
• noting that dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is disfavored where matters outside the complaint are not considered and where equitable tolling may apply
• noting that dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is disfavored where matters outside the complaint are not considered and where equitable tolling may apply
• noting that dismissal on statute of limitations grounds is disfavored where matters outside the complaint are not considered and where equitable tolling may apply
• noting that in actions where the federal court borrows the state statute of 6 limitation, the federal court also borrows all applicable provisions for tolling the 7 limitations period found in state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).