Asinmaz v. Semrau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a jeweler’s action for defamation against a customer was not frivolous under a post-1999 version of the statute where “the case was not completely without merit or contradicted by overwhelming evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).