Ashraf-Hassan v. Embassy of France in the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the foreign state in that case “may have expressly waived its immunity in its initial pleading”
• stating further that “[a]lthough, in this case, there is no such express provision in either a treaty or contract, Defendant may have expressly waived its immunity in its initial pleading”
• “[A] motion to dismiss that omits mention of immunity will not provide sufficient proof of such a conscious decision.”
• “Defendant may delay these proceedings, but it may not evade trial by means of this transparent ploy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).