Ashpole v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defense counsel planned on calling eyewitness but failed to disclose her, counsel acted in bad faith; trial court abused its discretion in allowing witness’s testimony
• where defendant violated Rule 213 by failing to identify witness in interrogatory answers or supplements, court erred in allowing witness’s testimony; appropriate sanction was to bar witness from testifying on remand
• where defense counsel planned on calling eyewitness but failed to disclose her, counsel acted in bad faith; trial court abused its discretion in allowing witness’s testimony
• where defendant violated Rule 213 by failing to identify witness in interrogatory answers or supplements, court erred in allowing witness’s testimony; appropriate sanction was to bar witness from testifying on remand
• the mid-trial disclosure of witness was sufficiently prejudicial to necessitate new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).