Skip to main content
· 10/30/2003

Ashok v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 289 F. Supp. 2d 305
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19279
  • 2003 WL 22461841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a two-month interval between plaintiff’s participation in protected activity and adverse employment action “may permit a reasonable jury to find the acts to be temporally proximate and causally related”
  • the interval between a protected activity and an adverse action that results in a finding of retaliation is generally no more than several months
  • the interval between a protected activity and an adverse action that results in a finding of retaliation is generally no more than several months
  • the interval between a protected activity and an adverse action that results in a finding of retaliation is generally no more than several months
  • the interval between a protected activity and an adverse action that results in a finding of retaliation is generally no more than several months
  • the interval between a protected activity and an adverse action that results in a finding of retaliation is generally no more than several months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.