Ashness v. Tonev

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant failed to establish materiality because “even without the suppressed [evidence], it is apparent from the 19 trial evidence alone that [the witness] was an imperfect witness, a point that defense counsel could and did drive home to the jury”
• discussing and applying Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 572-73 (1985)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).