Ashley v. U.S. Department of Labor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no implied adoption \even if a disputed document is several years old . . . [and] has not yet produced a[n] [anticipated] final decision\
• “Similarly, an agency’s rejection of the recommendations in a withheld document, either explicitly or implicitly through agency inaction, does not make otherwise predecisional documents final and disclosable.” (citing Common Cause v. IRS, 646 F.2d 656, 659 (D.C. Cir. 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).