· 10/19/2000
Ashley v. Snyder
Citations
- 739 N.E.2d 897
- 250 Ill. Dec. 900
- 316 Ill. App. 3d 1252
- 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding prison regulations were never intended to confer rights on inmates or serve as a basis for constitutional claims
- explaining that Unified Code of Corrections was “designed to provide guidance to prison officials in the administration of prisons,” not to confer rights on inmates
- stating that the Illinois Administrative Code “creates no more rights for inmates than those which are constitutionally required”
- holding prison regulations were never intended to confer rights on inmates or serve as a basis for constitutional claims
- explaining that Unified Code of Corrections was “designed to provide guidance to prison officials in the administration of prisons,” not to confer rights on inmates
- where this court wrote that a prisoner’s most important right was “the right to be free from violence and terror at the hands of other inmates”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steigmann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.