Skip to main content
· 3/24/1987

Ashland Pipeline Co. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 505 N.E.2d 483
  • 1987 Ind. App. LEXIS 2491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the means of knowledge combined with the duty to utilize that means equate with knowledge itself”
  • “Whatever fairly puts a person on inquiry is sufficient notice, where the means of knowledge are at hand; and if he omits to inquire, he is then chargeable with all the facts which, by a proper inquiry, he might have ascertained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Ratlifef, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.