· 3/24/1987
Ashland Pipeline Co. v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.
Citations
- 505 N.E.2d 483
- 1987 Ind. App. LEXIS 2491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the means of knowledge combined with the duty to utilize that means equate with knowledge itself”
- “Whatever fairly puts a person on inquiry is sufficient notice, where the means of knowledge are at hand; and if he omits to inquire, he is then chargeable with all the facts which, by a proper inquiry, he might have ascertained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neal, Ratlifef, Garrard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.