Skip to main content
· 12/20/2011

Ashford v. Division of Employment Security

Citations

  • 355 S.W.3d 538
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1676
  • 2011 WL 6989827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When, as here, the Commission adopts the decision of the Appeals Tribunal, we consider the Tribunal’s decision to be the Commission’s for purposes of our review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ahuja, Newton, Welsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.