Ashcraft v. National Theatre Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant failed to meet its burden where it did not present a privilege log or explain why it failed to so do
• stating that the “reasonableness limit on a party's anticipation of litigation” requires the threat of litigation to be “real” and “imminent”
• stating that the “reasonableness limit on a party’s anticipation of litigation” requires the threat of litigation to be “real” and “imminent”
• stating that the “reasonableness limit on a party’s anticipation of litigation” requires the threat of litigation to be “real” and “imminent”
• addressing a relevance objection the responding party preserved and asserted in response to the motion to compel
• overruling privilege and work-product objections where defendant “did not provide the court with sufficient information” to determine whether either applied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).