· 3/15/1991
Ashcraft v. King
Citations
- 228 Cal. App. 3d 604
- 278 Cal. Rptr. 900
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1926
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 3115
- 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 244
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- surgeon committed battery when patient’s consent to operation was conditioned on use of family-donated blood only, and surgeon intentionally violated condition
- consent to surgery conditioned on use of family-donated blood, but doctor used blood from general supply
- battery action where plaintiff agreed to surgery on condition that blood donated would be from her family, but during surgery, the hospital used its general blood supply and plaintiff acquired HIV allegedly from transfused blood
- defining civil battery under California law
- defining civil battery under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.