Ashby v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that taxpayers were entitled to an abatement to sixty-three percent of fair market value — the general level of assessment in the municipality — when the municipality assessed their property at eighty-four percent of fair market value
• explaining that, in order to achieve proportionality, all taxpayers must be assessed at the same percentage of fair market value
• recognizing town must apply uniform equalization ratio to ensure proportional assessments
• “When asked to consider taxpayer proportionality, we have consistently held that in order to achieve proportionality all taxpayers must be assessed at the same ratio.”
• “In order to achieve proportionality all taxpayers must be assessed at the same ratio.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).